If you think 6% was a lot to pay for real estate brokerage services, how about brokerages that add ‘ABC’ fees to their clients commissions? Real estate brokerage companies faced with lower profits have been attempting to add to their bottom line by charging additional ‘closing fees’. A recent ruling allowing a class-action lawsuit to proceed against an Alabama-based brokerage RealtySouth has captured the attention of other companies that could face similar claims that they are violating the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, or RESPA. In passing RESPA, HUD said, Congress meant not only to protect consumers against kickbacks, but “uneccessarily high settlement charges.”
In their defense, RealtySouth maintains that the cost of their services has increased while at the same time agents are demanding a higher split with brokers leaving little for the brokerages bottom line. The added fee helps them to offset the loss. RealtySouth isn’t alone in charging these additional fees. Most large brokerage companies recognizing diminishing profits have found that these fees are easier for consumers to swallow that an additional percentage or fractional percentage point.
IMHO, the problem isn’t that traditional commission based brokers are charging add-on fees, it’s that the commission based brokerage system is just that, ‘broke-n’.
The reason that brokerages companies fail to maintain profitability isn’t because they’re not charging enough, it’s because the traditional commission based system makes no sense for either the consumer or the broker. The system rewards brokers who are able to sell homes quickly with little time and resource expenditure and penalizes companies that take longer to sell homes and invest more money into the marketing process. That’s why the number of brokerages swells in periods like we had in the 10+ year run-up prior to the recent recession and why, now, we have brokerage companies failing on a collossal scale.
One might argue that in a good seller’s market, the need for high commission charging brokers greatly diminishes since properties are in many cases, in essence, selling themselves. In buyer’s markets like the present one, the costs associated with taking a listing, marketing the listing, engaging the time and resources of the brokerage’s office, staff and agents all toll up to unprofitability for traditional commission based firms. As long as the present system continues inequities will remain.
Consider that a traditional commissioned based broker earns the same amount of money for a listing that takes 1 year or longer to sell as it does for one that takes 1 week. This unalteratingly means that the lower the price the broker or its agents can encourage the seller to list the property for, the faster it will sell and the more money the brokerage will net. Of course, this is generally at odds with the goals of the firm’s ‘clients’ who would like to see a higher sales price even if the broker is required to expend more time, resources and marketing dollars to acheive a higher sales price.
Until real estate brokerages determine, en masse, that the more profitable business venture is a model that either charges by the hour or on a flat-fee ‘a la carte’ basis, consumers and brokers will continue to suffer.
RSS Feed

May 28th, 2009
admin 



















Posted in



